M1 Pro 14". Previously used a 32" 4k monitor. Font smoothing off, using FF/preview for comparison. Recently purchased both a M28U (4k @ 144hz over USB-C), and a MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD (1440p @ 144hz/165hz), over HDMI 2.0), both of which are highly rated by rtings.Mine is GTX 1080 and 3 monitors 4K 120Hz + 4K 60Hz + 2K 60Hz. It runs well at 110FPS for dota2 only. But I will upgrade to 2080s later for other games. It can handle the 4K at good settings on current games, at 165hz at 1440p not sure but you should swing about 100 easily at least even if you have to drop a shadow or volumetric tier on some of The best 4K monitor for NBA 2K24 has to be the LG 27GN950-B UltraGear Gaming Monitor. It brings a phenomenal 4K experience to NBA with its 27” nano IPS panel running at 3840 x 2160 resolution.
Solution. #3. yeah, but you're sacrificing frame rate cuz you'd be making the GPU process stuff at a far higher resolution, so it might only do 1/2 or 1/3 of the frame rate you'd get if you kept it at 1080p. if the output frame rate at the 2k/4k is still above 60fps then you'd probably benefit from the extra processing, but if it results in an
180hz 4k 10 bit will not work on hdmi 2.1 because it will require 49.85 Gbit/s, hdmi 2.1 maximum bandwidth is 48g. It can do 4k 180hz on 8 bit no issues. my bad. I was looking at 8 bit. No, there is hope the new nvida and amd gus will come with full displayport 2.0 80g and that will make everything better.
If you are using a 4K monitor and have your game set to run at 2K, the images being displayed are still being stretched to 4K. Older games can run smoothly at 4K with less powerful graphics
Yea, but they can heavily optimize for that specific console. Also, it helps to mention that pc gamers usually game at a desk and so 4k is irrelevant. Today, most mid to high end tvs are all 4k. So console trying to hit that target even with dynamic res is not that surprising. 30fps is still very playable, and if it has good frame pacing, can